Our group studies how structure and symmetry enable robust quantum information processing and precision sensing. Current themes include:
We are interested in new kinds of codes e.g. bosonic codes, we design and analyze codes that suppress realistic noise while remaining hardware-aware. See e.g.
We explore protected and engineered‑spectrum qubits (e.g., 0–π‑like circuits), mapping design space to stability, control, and readout. And we have developed an enumeration framework to systematically catalogue superconducting qubit circuit designs, mapping their parameters to performance and stability characteristics. See e.g.
We study the fundamentals and applications of measurement in quantum systems, including backaction, weak measurement, and near-quantum-limited amplification for fast, high-fidelity control and sensing. See e.g. Quantum limits on phase-preserving linear amplifiers
(PRA, 2012). Two key interest are developing new kinds of amplifiers and
new kinds of quantum measurements. Recent examples of these are
I have a long-standing interest in pushing the limits of parameter estimation. My work began with atomic interferometry (2005) and has since spanned: Probabilistic metrology, Nonlinear metrology, and error corrected metrology. I recently became involved in the field of frequency combs through a rewarding collaboration with Scott Diddams and Jérôme Genest.
We explore how quantum states of light—such as single photons and squeezed light—interact with atoms and other quantum systems. The interaction of matter with classical light (thermal or coherent/laser light) is well understood. Replacing the light with nonclassical states often produces non-Markovian dynamics and far richer physics. Understanding these interactions is key to advancing quantum communication, precision sensing, and technologies that use light as “flying qubits” to connect quantum devices. This has been a long-standing collaboration with Ben Baragiola and Jonathan Gross see e.g.
During my PhD, Kurt Jacobs, Howard Wiseman, and I developed feedback protocols that use continuous weak measurement and feedback to accelerate either information gain or entropy removal from a quantum system. We quantify the advantage over no-feedback strategies with a speedup factor
Rapid measurement protocols aim to minimize the time needed to determine a measurement outcome with high confidence. They also increase purity, making them a subset of rapid purification. See e.g.
Rapid purification protocols are designed to drive an initially mixed state to a pure state as quickly as possible. They achieve near-deterministic performance by measuring in an unbiased basis, but cannot perform readout and thus are not rapid measurement schemes. Two key papers in this area: